tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-82666460958520485252024-03-08T03:32:54.404-08:00WHAT IS FAMEPUNK?Mehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09112613661290336699noreply@blogger.comBlogger38125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8266646095852048525.post-80275983416896324842023-07-11T15:31:00.006-07:002023-07-11T18:08:55.533-07:00Wozniacki Comeback<p> </p><table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><tbody><tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiP4RORgZpYdyBDeqDr8Zse79RKJoLa6JK7CW9KtgtbHeDLRfwhKtCu1-92Bjo-t8tsvBkhZ3Zpt_zD7W76Eg56ADyu21l8EInAq14G2WJF6G5YpswYoTMrF0jz5Z8WgyYxUF4Is114m9iI9F61CeaXRUOburHFF3A6YUGS459xnRDcwxSUw5pvKRFAQ9w/s800/2008.jpg" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="523" data-original-width="800" height="261" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiP4RORgZpYdyBDeqDr8Zse79RKJoLa6JK7CW9KtgtbHeDLRfwhKtCu1-92Bjo-t8tsvBkhZ3Zpt_zD7W76Eg56ADyu21l8EInAq14G2WJF6G5YpswYoTMrF0jz5Z8WgyYxUF4Is114m9iI9F61CeaXRUOburHFF3A6YUGS459xnRDcwxSUw5pvKRFAQ9w/w400-h261/2008.jpg" width="400" /></a></td></tr><tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><i>2008</i></td></tr></tbody></table><p class="MsoNormal">For a long time I’ve meant to write about Caroline Wozniacki,
the Danish player (of Polish parents) who surprised me by retiring in
2020, at the age of 29. For as much as any player, she helped inspire <b>Famepunk</b>.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Specifically, I credit watching Wozniacki with a major plot
point. In the first volume, <b>US Open 1987</b>, the heroine’s progress through the
tournament is causing her to miss freshman orientation activities at the
college of her dreams; in the end, she doesn’t go. College or career is a
choice that tennis players aren’t alone in facing. For me, college was the only
option, ever; most people I knew were the same, partly because we were none of us
blessed with astonishing athletic talent. Caroline Wozniacki, who was, caught
my notice early in her career when she started winning a US Open women’s warm-up
tournament that used to be held every August in New Haven. I watched her play
on cable TV, listened to her interviews; I was watching the night she put her ponytail
into what became her trademark braid, which I never liked quite as well. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">It might have been during a championship match when it occurred
to me that Yale, seeing as how she was 18 and in town, ought to make Caroline
Wozniacki an immediate offer of admission. It was clear to me that she could
more than handle the work entailed to graduate at the top of her class. Maybe
(definitely, I thought) tennis doesn’t need another young blonde goddess—not as
much as the whole planet, really, needs intelligent, articulate, strong, healthy,
charismatic young women who speak multiple languages fluently as teens, to
study and train for leadership roles in the society to come.</p><p class="MsoNormal"><br /></p><table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><tbody><tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjaxoU8aMYQ0q2Q53rOAkedD92TKN2FEumsQItB3pYQWNSPqxFjpFvLdt_IJTsLDcpqPFkIKxRB3QPYTtqm5Ocz9H4yodlyTQHflBQcf5WaQBWRq_173oappsiliSNPUlsYwDEEsR1UcE6vFsZzlyl-4EcIM2_dw3OYeKaWUDqEwY9u8jSseCpEODInmkg/s810/Caroline_Wozniacki_2017.jpg" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="810" data-original-width="800" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjaxoU8aMYQ0q2Q53rOAkedD92TKN2FEumsQItB3pYQWNSPqxFjpFvLdt_IJTsLDcpqPFkIKxRB3QPYTtqm5Ocz9H4yodlyTQHflBQcf5WaQBWRq_173oappsiliSNPUlsYwDEEsR1UcE6vFsZzlyl-4EcIM2_dw3OYeKaWUDqEwY9u8jSseCpEODInmkg/s320/Caroline_Wozniacki_2017.jpg" width="316" /></a></td></tr><tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><span style="background-color: white; color: #404040; font-family: Vollkorn, serif; font-style: italic;">2017; By Christian Mesiano – Caroline Wozniacki, CC BY-SA 2.0, via </span><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caroline_Wozniacki#/media/File:Caroline_Wozniacki_2017.jpg" rel="noreferrer noopener" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: inherit; color: #db0a2d; font-family: Vollkorn, serif; font-style: italic; transition: all 0.1s ease-in 0s;" target="_blank">Wikimedia</a><br /><br /></td></tr></tbody></table><p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Yale would have been the starting point for that ascension I
was picturing, and later played around with in <b>Famepunk</b>. I was sorry that Wozniacki didn't enroll at the time. Back then
(2008 or 2009), the first objection to the idea would have been that compared to the pursuit
of an undergraduate degree, even in New Haven, a full-fledged professional
tennis career must offer immeasurably more key preparation for a successful life in the
rooms of power—rooms already crowded with Ivy Leaguers whom her fame and wealth, self-earned, would start her on a step above. By this argument,
naturally unanswerable then, once she played out her time in the WTA and
retired a multiple champion, Caroline Wozniacki would pause, maybe marry and
have children (as she has done), and then go out and take her place as an important
decision-maker somewhere. Danish politics, diplomacy, major philanthropy or big
relief projects, head of a green technology company—anything.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Instead, here we are, with the recent announcement that she’ll be competing next month in Canada preparatory to another crack at the US Open title. What happened? In the past year she’s already returned to tennis as a match commentator; she’s got a sleepy, Kim Novak-style voice which I don’t mind
but no one would argue that we need more match commentators in the universe.
This week she’s playing at Wimbledon in the Legends event, which brings retired
players, many great names, back to the courts for the public to enjoy. But with
players like Navratilova, Hingis, Sabatini there, no one is really clamoring to
see Caroline Wozniacki, too, not when she’s only been gone a few years.</p><p class="MsoNormal"><br /></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"></p><table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><tbody><tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgTPgIGOreizoqqVHxGYDDi47kJkq3_6kA0shy_XV-56_8ZyYXMGVN-MNPeLcE6RRItKE8GHZ6_vI-PDFZyy52w9NmPkSqXP-QGhESNN_fjFFWPdWIcuEusjblGAUkuHux-SGzw44d4rJtjH9kf8WGw3b2bYdg8LBZhSSeD3TCCumenNM2lO6-5yeLNJdc/s1920/2019.jpg" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1080" data-original-width="1920" height="225" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgTPgIGOreizoqqVHxGYDDi47kJkq3_6kA0shy_XV-56_8ZyYXMGVN-MNPeLcE6RRItKE8GHZ6_vI-PDFZyy52w9NmPkSqXP-QGhESNN_fjFFWPdWIcuEusjblGAUkuHux-SGzw44d4rJtjH9kf8WGw3b2bYdg8LBZhSSeD3TCCumenNM2lO6-5yeLNJdc/w400-h225/2019.jpg" width="400" /></a></td></tr><tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><i>2019</i></td></tr></tbody></table><br /><p></p><p class="MsoNormal">What’s behind the comeback phenomenon? Is it really, as
cynics suggest, that top players just can’t stand to give up the perks of a
champion’s lifestyle? Or is it being the center of attention that they come
to miss too much to stay away? It must feel like free money, after a point, if
people keep letting you earn when you’re long past your prime; a nest egg, a
comfortable cushion, or a grateful way out of some financial or family
dilemma—comebacks must come in handy, for sure.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">But the productive lifetimes of which we were cheated, somehow—they
don’t come back. They never were. Admirable womanhoods of power, impact, and
long duration, exchanged for short primes and six-decade twilights: someone with
Caroline Wozniacki’s overall potential and abilities shouldn’t have become irrelevant to the
rest of us so young. And she senses this, knows this; it’s why she’s coming
back. Is she moving in the right direction, though? Now might be a better time
to consider getting an advanced degree.</p>Mehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09112613661290336699noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8266646095852048525.post-39042607597914341212022-09-13T18:19:00.009-07:002022-09-16T18:21:03.020-07:00Surprise Obsolescence<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh4gO0fidPjGZ5INks6D6FjiZlCHwILz2RNta2kpY3DOpbS9TyIoLcukgdxp0FOHDvY-CSjHe49I3DRlPw-rXdH_rhNjt9SapkTnU_ZO7wwogEPDZiATpNby7IpG0-zOgniUn6wJ68epu__PXMUczd23ZBKy7eGc9g772B5PHsqf7rnUatjN_DztRo7/s478/CRCKD1.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="478" data-original-width="359" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh4gO0fidPjGZ5INks6D6FjiZlCHwILz2RNta2kpY3DOpbS9TyIoLcukgdxp0FOHDvY-CSjHe49I3DRlPw-rXdH_rhNjt9SapkTnU_ZO7wwogEPDZiATpNby7IpG0-zOgniUn6wJ68epu__PXMUczd23ZBKy7eGc9g772B5PHsqf7rnUatjN_DztRo7/w300-h400/CRCKD1.jpg" width="300" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br /></div><p class="MsoNormal"><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/1996/06/17/sports/IHT-waiting-for-the-beep-instead-of-judges-let.html" target="_blank">It was billed as a safety measure in 1996</a> when professional tennis began replacing net cord judges and their fingertips (and their proneness to getting beaned by errant shots) with digital sensors. The electronic line call system used during every match at this year's US Open had a solid trial run as an anti-COVID technology. At first, since a pre-recorded
human cry of “Out!” is triggered when a ball goes wide or long, it’s possible to overlook what’s missing: an entire profession. Line
judging sparks a decisive turn in the final match climax of <b>FAMEPUNK: US
Open 1987</b> which could never happen now, twenty-five years after those fictional
events.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The men and women who crouched and hunkered down and peered
and saw, with notable accuracy, where the close balls fell were intriguing
characters on the tennis courts in Queens. That they drew pay was a known fact. Not all were local, many flew in. Some had been unsuccessful players. From finding chances to preside at the
smallest events they’d climbed a ranking board to reach the pinnacle, working
these two weeks of August, outdoors, on their feet. The great hard courts look bare without them: factory floors
emptied, mopped and made hygienic for the robot replacements’ sake. <a href="https://www.npr.org/2022/09/10/1121801484/us-open-tennis-human-line-judges-replaced" target="_blank">Touted as “cleaner”for players, viewers and sponsors</a>, one upshot sees dozens of
still-indispensable ball boys and balls girls thrown into higher relief. The
line judges—their absence makes clear—had interposed a layer of responsible and
adult presence between a sexually omnivorous world viewership and the ball kids’
flashing knees; oversized uniforms and all, child labor stays, adults go
redundant, and the pedo class delights.</p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgx7W8A37PI4Acuk6MSrFVoN7Kfn5W31HajItixrVWitv2N43in3A2CZY3pRQnQRd27IMYjVqJhAqL9XxUn2THLyTSDFLU0rK-XEVfcq9Kue2MLbozz_rFYatU2Mffpfk7WuVwZdsz2KZ5mwEVkDRo0TB4ab5VpweI0PP2fHRxywrtvf0E60ts28xcJ/s539/CRCKD2.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="432" data-original-width="539" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgx7W8A37PI4Acuk6MSrFVoN7Kfn5W31HajItixrVWitv2N43in3A2CZY3pRQnQRd27IMYjVqJhAqL9XxUn2THLyTSDFLU0rK-XEVfcq9Kue2MLbozz_rFYatU2Mffpfk7WuVwZdsz2KZ5mwEVkDRo0TB4ab5VpweI0PP2fHRxywrtvf0E60ts28xcJ/w400-h320/CRCKD2.jpg" width="400" /></a></div><br /><p>Chair umpires are still out there as well. As if to compensate for the loss of opportunities to overrule a line judge call, this current showboating generation finds ways to keep the cameras on itself, and in its meager celebrity might be allowed to age in place. Its successors are bound to be artificial: for chair umpires are only line judges who rose to the top and now sit up high, after years and years of being bent at the waist at the back of the court, crouching, peering, barking calls, enduring abusive tantrums. With the US Open off the table, who would persevere? A dry pipeline awaits.</p><p class="MsoNormal"><!-- wp:paragraph -->
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->
<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->
<!-- wp:paragraph -->
</p><p></p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph --><p></p><p>Electronic line-calling also means the end of disputed calls--and with them an entire discourse, no less a part of a pro player’s “tennis vocabulary” than a slice or a grip. When every call is correct, there’s no space for expressing disagreement, disbelief, outrage; there's no one there to bitch at; there's no more buying time with a strategic sure-to-fail challenge. Countless acres of on-court drama and human engagement have been eradicated before they could happen.</p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjX5tMAdQ2Is3Ul3-4KmeSyq0WLRbxlo0Qhb1fBHW6P0gY8LoZA_PeR-avg6TXiVrxNkTzoomdjhpZ1dlSvdTZxAv8dvmx-K9W8wUutUd9cf-ENeYYeOEZrsMZZ7r2zKx1gmT_qJx5QPWUQ1PUx5tjXbdmEZ_TdmGxaSmKe4jB9g6LHlMzM1Iow7Ay4/s450/CRCKD3.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="298" data-original-width="450" height="265" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjX5tMAdQ2Is3Ul3-4KmeSyq0WLRbxlo0Qhb1fBHW6P0gY8LoZA_PeR-avg6TXiVrxNkTzoomdjhpZ1dlSvdTZxAv8dvmx-K9W8wUutUd9cf-ENeYYeOEZrsMZZ7r2zKx1gmT_qJx5QPWUQ1PUx5tjXbdmEZ_TdmGxaSmKe4jB9g6LHlMzM1Iow7Ay4/w400-h265/CRCKD3.jpg" width="400" /></a></div><br /><p class="MsoNormal"><br /></p>Mehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09112613661290336699noreply@blogger.com0Brooklyn, NY, USA40.6781784 -73.9441579-16.641667832093084 -144.2566579 90 -3.6316578999999933tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8266646095852048525.post-14106896320160731732021-09-11T18:24:00.001-07:002021-09-11T18:24:30.836-07:00Prophetess Motives<p> </p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjr0p0i0yTWQGVWyH-RSFDjmiT6SdsuuVAl9IjxTmvjtVigTiuwXl9X0l9b9diWc58wBnNuwOpkHMFMiwUVI0o0AbzzXNpoqg9JRwEkqmAT_4BF5Ol8804L-iKsRVdP3aBNQDW04OOy7B8/s1500/RACQUET.pdf.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="842" data-original-width="1500" height="225" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjr0p0i0yTWQGVWyH-RSFDjmiT6SdsuuVAl9IjxTmvjtVigTiuwXl9X0l9b9diWc58wBnNuwOpkHMFMiwUVI0o0AbzzXNpoqg9JRwEkqmAT_4BF5Ol8804L-iKsRVdP3aBNQDW04OOy7B8/w400-h225/RACQUET.pdf.jpg" width="400" /></a></div><br /><blockquote><blockquote><div><p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-pagination: none; text-align: justify; text-indent: .2in;"><span style="font-family: "Garamond","serif"; font-size: 11.0pt; mso-fareast-font-family: "Arial Unicode MS";">The women’s game had a bad reputation, in truth, because
every few years since the First World War some teenaged girl would come along out
of nowhere to beat all the established players back into historical
footnotes—as if they hadn’t been playing the game properly, not for a while; as
if they’d been subjecting the public to a charade with their cough-cough
married lady patty-caking back and forth at one another; when some of these
girls were so exceedingly young and they just beat everybody. It was difficult
for women such as Cookie Toms who desperately wanted respect with a capital R
to gain any traction in its pursuit because women’s tennis just didn’t look
good to a great many people. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<span style="font-family: "Garamond","serif"; font-size: 11.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: "Arial Unicode MS"; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;">But Cookie and her
band of like-minded players had persevered and prevailed.</span></div></blockquote></blockquote><p> </p><p>This is from Middlemarch, Part 2 of Famepunk--a story which is looking very forward-looking, to say the least, today, when an virtually unknown qualifier still in her teens has just won the women's singles final at the US Open. In fact, the women's draw in the other half was wiped out by a hungry teen, too.</p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEibHDrYo991cGHih2KEnV-Y0f0d-W3bXQ7mhVGliVO5oWkpGJ8ahgPqxfYbVR99CdVaCDg6Y7MCGRbLuqH5Grn7GWWbTSZVUSUvceAV8Eo4Pj3xBetoQYgVnyr2gvgfg-iApu9LAmQPRkw/s2016/FERNANDEZ.RADUCANU.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1381" data-original-width="2016" height="274" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEibHDrYo991cGHih2KEnV-Y0f0d-W3bXQ7mhVGliVO5oWkpGJ8ahgPqxfYbVR99CdVaCDg6Y7MCGRbLuqH5Grn7GWWbTSZVUSUvceAV8Eo4Pj3xBetoQYgVnyr2gvgfg-iApu9LAmQPRkw/w400-h274/FERNANDEZ.RADUCANU.jpg" width="400" /></a></div><br /><p>Congratulations to Emma Raducanu <i>(above, right),</i> and to her worthy opponent, 19 year-old Leyla Fernandez, who won many hearts with her valiant play this tournament.</p><p>In Emma Jasohn, the heroine of Famepunk, I'm proud to have created a champion who paved the way in fiction for a player to go from qualifier to trophy-holder in three weeks at Queens; in real life, it had never been done until now. </p><p>What will come true next? <a href="https://nostalgistudio.com/buy-digital/" target="_blank">Read the books</a> and find out before it happens. </p><p>But back to Cookie Toms and her band of like-minded players: this follows history pretty closely, and is modeled on "The Nine" who rebelled against women's second-class citizenship in professional tennis by starting their own association and tour, which Virginia Slims cigarettes sponsored. Fifty years later, what's now the WTA swims in money. Billie Jean King, model for Cookie Toms and like her the greatest of all champions, continues to deserve all accolades; and the sponsorships are still looking very suspect. A video tribute to The Nine, shown between Thursday's two women's semifinals, looked like this to those watching in the stadium <i>and</i> at home:</p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjPpPH_3woUkC1tqDSm2SQl7ETBfxOSEgYlcqh9Yg8_9HlUMpzC044PnQuBAUbyoL7FxWwhcy241EmK7TyLGi2q50Img1stBsto9UrWTCgCZq3cLJZ34VvtSiMr2n41lsDY8l02j1kvg1k/s1193/UAE1.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="771" data-original-width="1193" height="207" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjPpPH_3woUkC1tqDSm2SQl7ETBfxOSEgYlcqh9Yg8_9HlUMpzC044PnQuBAUbyoL7FxWwhcy241EmK7TyLGi2q50Img1stBsto9UrWTCgCZq3cLJZ34VvtSiMr2n41lsDY8l02j1kvg1k/s320/UAE1.jpg" width="320" /></a></div><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj_Hen-x20_8WyYx2YPM0_XPd0JitiRp-MClqhHtwWDmH8pDKkg4fozHiHLbKSXgUeBgBekssxn0jIA3CMXtCbqEVewin0aXeymo99yDd84o8GCTInsCGQR6r8g5Pw7iPj2UAohO-0Uiuo/s1186/UAE2.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="772" data-original-width="1186" height="208" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj_Hen-x20_8WyYx2YPM0_XPd0JitiRp-MClqhHtwWDmH8pDKkg4fozHiHLbKSXgUeBgBekssxn0jIA3CMXtCbqEVewin0aXeymo99yDd84o8GCTInsCGQR6r8g5Pw7iPj2UAohO-0Uiuo/s320/UAE2.jpg" width="320" /></a></div><br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgQEyieuiyl2m_E8bdHkNeDeX13d7dekHtyWIfjic6uUG-3-RmggP-oTY_r0Fia-Brmpu5N-3V3shHc_ycH1a44XYdd1lA7lHcFCjZun3bXdiuJvtcixtgIriSOnCVt6q7JNRJWSJWr-yk/s1086/UAE3.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="761" data-original-width="1086" height="224" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgQEyieuiyl2m_E8bdHkNeDeX13d7dekHtyWIfjic6uUG-3-RmggP-oTY_r0Fia-Brmpu5N-3V3shHc_ycH1a44XYdd1lA7lHcFCjZun3bXdiuJvtcixtgIriSOnCVt6q7JNRJWSJWr-yk/s320/UAE3.jpg" width="320" /></a></div><br /><p>To be fair, in Dubai and (most of) the UAE, though their skirts had better reach the knee and spaghetti straps will not be tolerated, women are not required to cover their heads or faces in public. </p><p>So Fly There Today!</p><p><br /></p><blockquote><blockquote><div><span style="font-family: "Garamond","serif"; font-size: 11.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: "Arial Unicode MS"; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;"> </span></div></blockquote></blockquote>Mehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09112613661290336699noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8266646095852048525.post-82589115136174627992020-07-10T20:18:00.001-07:002020-07-18T19:29:44.583-07:00The Tennis Fan Today (Part 1)<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEila4sszU2jfcPPVnsyHvW3SRLZgZ5M1KRVabTVCB-_WZ_HMt-vwVT16hc4y36pOz6t2mkHrkd_4clFSTQdn6XyyKFWxQEMBfpVCgfmHvNw9kcFi1CSo5vw3RuxN6W5Z6MaIQfTgmfVFKs/s1600/25aussie-superJumbo.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1128" data-original-width="1600" height="280" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEila4sszU2jfcPPVnsyHvW3SRLZgZ5M1KRVabTVCB-_WZ_HMt-vwVT16hc4y36pOz6t2mkHrkd_4clFSTQdn6XyyKFWxQEMBfpVCgfmHvNw9kcFi1CSo5vw3RuxN6W5Z6MaIQfTgmfVFKs/s400/25aussie-superJumbo.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
Professional tennis, and the watching of professional tennis, are two completely different matters. A person can love professional tennis as I do and yet never watch it, and not miss it, and not even mind when it isn’t being played. This empty Wimbledon pandemic fortnight, after the blank where Roland Garros should have been, leaves me shrugging with equal indifference. Of course, if Maria Sharapova hadn’t retired my guess is I’d feel differently, bothered at least if not somewhat heartsick on her behalf. I’d have loved to see her win more titles. But as it is, I don’t care.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Blame the impedimenta. To attending in professional tennis events in person in a normal year, a long list: inconvenience, jacked-up prices, extreme overcrowding, intrusive security, feral bands of child autograph hunters, terrible pop music playing on the changeovers (put this at the top of the list) and all over the grounds, the air thick with beeriness and meat smoke, the fatigue-slackened faces silvered by Jumbotron light pollution: a horrible time and this is with comp tickets, forget about having to pay for them.</div>
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
But to follow from afar is not much easier nor any more pleasant. What started out, for one thing, as too many commercials has become too much to pay monthly for a premium cable subscription: an annoyance has grown into a major barrier. Beyond which is “the product” itself—always a product, professional tennis have never been more of one—how it looks and what it contains. When I’ve been able to watch on occasion these past several years, I’ve seen the commercials haven’t gone anywhere, they’ve multiplied inside the broadcasts and overrun the tournaments, the courts, the players’ persons. Information-wise, it’s a wasteland of pointless statistics, canned themes, obfuscation and hacky hagiography. The commentators chatter without ceasing. I especially dread the national embarrassment that settles in as the Americans mispronounce every single “foreign” player’s name. It’s deliberate, I’ve even heard them refer to the “Americanized version.” The embarrassment and sorrow at how our media hold us back, we the people who could use better training from childhood onward, these deep feelings get in there and spoil my enjoyment, over time they’ve helped to erode my wish to watch at all.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Slash a way through all these unpalatable trappings and there is professional tennis, the game itself and the act of watching it being played. Without question, we see our human civilization at a peak here—more than one, really. As sports go, like baseball, it’s full of perfections. Unusually, both sexes reach the highest levels of play, of reward, and of fame. The best men are like demigods. And where else have women, rising in white skirts out of immemorial subjections, made such a sustained display of active liberated female bodies, unrestrained and self-directed, excelling in competition? Simply to sit and reflect on the last century in professional women’s tennis is to be in touch with the highest ideals, while memory fills with heroics and proud moments. Tennis in thought is very beautiful.<br />
<br />
In finding ways to make the pleasure of watching
professional tennis outweigh the depressing nastiness of actually doing so, the
modern fan leans hard on personalities. Attachments and infatuations bind us to
the sight of certain players so that we’ll put up with the most aggravating
coverage in return. Also, great players,
like Maria Sharapova, make it worthwhile to watch them. Though too many beautiful
quiet tensions have gone from today’s noisy game (which despite what people say
won’t be appreciably quieter in her absence when play resumes this year), a
mute control brings goodness back, like a magic wand whose wave leaves us alone
in the hush with our love idols.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
I’d stopped muting Maria years ago, however, when I began to
love the way she vocalized. Her whole game just captured me. <a href="http://www.liz-mackie.com/FAMEPUNK/MSVALOOP.WAV" target="_blank">Here is a tinyloop from a final she played at Stanford in August 2010</a>. Victoria Azarenka’s
voice is first, Sharapova’s second.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEizb8bXp8gauTjTW13rJI6faq9elfT554v9clMnliroSeA1QObP5VfsJ1_9HizRVz1ZSkokA1HwqVowOzRVAcWgnRz7R8xSmN5sn9AbPYxdcvqHe6b1Zs-uFtzc9a8x__ReGsgxnhzGHVU/s1600/mariawinrg2014.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="450" data-original-width="675" height="266" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEizb8bXp8gauTjTW13rJI6faq9elfT554v9clMnliroSeA1QObP5VfsJ1_9HizRVz1ZSkokA1HwqVowOzRVAcWgnRz7R8xSmN5sn9AbPYxdcvqHe6b1Zs-uFtzc9a8x__ReGsgxnhzGHVU/s400/mariawinrg2014.jpg" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">2nd Roland Garros title</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<br />Mehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09112613661290336699noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8266646095852048525.post-965678637575670552018-08-04T16:08:00.000-07:002018-08-04T16:16:04.625-07:00About Tennis<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><span style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_mZZPOlRKpA" target="_blank"><img border="0" data-original-height="720" data-original-width="1280" height="225" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEib3tyAtrVi-IhwcB29o_o8kldWyw_3kfwnbhPF7ine6v0rUPruCUmZva5qLhvlG41qD2WIGDYQdnsi5plkqNJUc9XuiE7_CUd5P596XWHKRmlFK8awAb3q33rT_xWtZzl3B210eJDLkO8/s400/1987final.jpg" width="400" /></a></span></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><i><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_mZZPOlRKpA" target="_blank">The real one</a></i></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<b>US Open 1987 </b>has been out and available for several years now, in its <a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/1463591985/ref=cm_sw_su_dp" target="_blank">CreateSpace edition</a>. As I began preparing the first Nostalgistudio edition for publication later this summer, I remembered that several people who read the book had told me they'd been a little lost at points because they don't know anything about tennis. For a tennis fan like me to hear this is shocking and sad, of course. I don't like to think of people being deprived of such an enjoyment--watching and being able to follow a good competitive tennis match is one of the higher pleasures in life, I think. As for the novel, the first chapter concerns a single fateful tennis match described in some detail. Those kind readers felt lost right away, this was the problem.<br />
<br />
So I wrote <a href="http://www.liz-mackie.com/FAMEPUNK/EXCERPTS/FP1.NOS.ADDTEXT.pdf" target="_blank">some more text, a few pages</a> to insert quite near the opening. If you've read the book and didn't get the tennis part, please accept this new material with my sincere and apologetic thanks. For newcomers, maybe people with some know-how about the game, I offer it for discussion. Did I miss too much again?<br />
<br />
(<a href="http://www.liz-mackie.com/FAMEPUNK/EXCERPTS/FP1.NOS.ADDTEXT.pdf" target="_blank">The new excerpt is here.</a>)<br />
<br />Mehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09112613661290336699noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8266646095852048525.post-81162817886708255742018-07-07T18:52:00.000-07:002018-07-08T19:05:11.014-07:00What a WimbledonHere I am spending hours and hours this fleeting summer in the preparation of new editions for <a href="https://nostalgistudio.com/" target="_blank">Nostalgistudio</a> of all three <b>FAMEPUNK</b> novels so far, immersed once again in women's tennis as a subject while simultaneously scanning its current state for promotional opportunities, ways to ride some surge in fandom into wider view. And what I see is so very far from promising anything of the sort, it might as well be a cloud of antitheses, when all but the seventh of the top ten ladies' singles seeds goes out in the first week. It's disgraceful and won't win fans--quite the contrary. Overpraised princesses wilting under a single round of pressure: no one wants to applaud that. To my personal horror, women's tennis has become the New York Mets. One loss, then two, then two others; they achieve something lemming-like, these super athletes in mostly identical dresses swatting forehands long.
<br />
<br />
<div style="padding-bottom: 54%; position: relative;">
<iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="100%" scrolling="no" src="https://gfycat.com/ifr/HonoredInferiorGuillemot" style="left: 0; position: absolute; top: 0;" width="100%"></iframe></div>
<a href="https://gfycat.com/gifs/detail/HonoredInferiorGuillemot">via Gfycat</a>Mehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09112613661290336699noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8266646095852048525.post-52325512529921646972018-05-26T20:19:00.000-07:002018-05-26T20:21:48.969-07:00LAMENT out now!<div class="smashwords-widget" data-bgcolor="#fafafa" data-buttoncolor="#ffc801" data-font="sans" data-headline="Lament: A Soviet Woman and Her True Story" data-height="250" data-items="book:833008" data-ribboncolor="#4181c3" data-type="single" data-width="300" style="height: 250px; width: 300px;">
</div>
<script async="async" id="smashwords-widget-js" src="//www.smashwidgets.com/1/widgets.js"></script>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
Mehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09112613661290336699noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8266646095852048525.post-24287784025901586682018-05-25T20:04:00.000-07:002018-05-25T20:21:06.869-07:00Another new clay seasonA little scare just now when I sat down to write a fresh entry and found myself signed out of my Blogger account after two years away. I could see my two little old sites still reading "me" but couldn't enter to refresh them, this one and <a href="http://readinglesmiserablesatwork.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Reading Les Miserables at Work</a> out of my control only drifted there, like junked space stations, relics. I sat bewildered. Then I thought, Would it matter? What if <b>What is Famepunk?</b> ended randomly, years out of date, out of carelessness? Couldn't it go on that way, an old attachment, always linked? Old and dead, yes--but would it matter? With a lynch-pin of my creative life (even if it hasn't looked like one lately) not just threatened but gone, snatched away, rationalizing like crazy, I kept calm. My mind formed ideas for going on without it, unencumbered by women's tennis blogging. But I was self-disgusted. I felt the loss I'd brought on myself through inattention. In the end I tried another sign-in, the right one. I'm grateful to be back.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi12lWCE30vlof3duS2QwR0AbN8j1h6GnvZ5S87CD-6e6_GBnk2wNUs01AUNnp-wVZcruk36UzCGrQyE_3jGNl6BakJOkIrOw00CX4wIzzuU0sKJ6oNhcle_cElyLRW_q27wUXaHl3I2AA/s1600/GARDEN+copy.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="635" data-original-width="700" height="362" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi12lWCE30vlof3duS2QwR0AbN8j1h6GnvZ5S87CD-6e6_GBnk2wNUs01AUNnp-wVZcruk36UzCGrQyE_3jGNl6BakJOkIrOw00CX4wIzzuU0sKJ6oNhcle_cElyLRW_q27wUXaHl3I2AA/s400/GARDEN+copy.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />Mehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09112613661290336699noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8266646095852048525.post-90538101995910954412017-04-09T13:42:00.003-07:002018-05-25T20:23:00.085-07:00Аутсайдеры<div class="separator" sab="12" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
Ostapenko versus Kasatkina. These are the outsidery finalists in this year's
Charleston green clay tournament. Neither player seeded, none of the top ten
seeds made it to the semifinals. Women's tennis continues down the path
it's set itself. <o:p sab="15"></o:p></div>
<div sab="15">
</div>
<div class="separator" sab="16" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiMSL3iqtg8mCMcXi-BYRqFjWBNTGj3qeY2_ZCz8QKQJLPLJNSk-qPb9tKOSIzM7kD-Oxl68LkmZw5zV7slN6FE_6h3w7hr5eXNpjWetBH__lZKliJkA5WgKPwIgPpsCZ3ISdkgJnAX75I/s1600/tashkent2.jpg" imageanchor="1" sab="17" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="310" sab="18" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiMSL3iqtg8mCMcXi-BYRqFjWBNTGj3qeY2_ZCz8QKQJLPLJNSk-qPb9tKOSIzM7kD-Oxl68LkmZw5zV7slN6FE_6h3w7hr5eXNpjWetBH__lZKliJkA5WgKPwIgPpsCZ3ISdkgJnAX75I/s400/tashkent2.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<div sab="19">
<div sab="1943">
<div sab="1955">
<div sab="1942">
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div sab="15">
<div sab="1946">
<div sab="1959">
<div sab="1947">
Paying too much for not playing, paying too much attention to
"storylines" over substance. And pampering, primping, pimping,
party-dressing its "stars" for consumption--by whom? Who is even
watching the WTA now? They haven't got a broadcast contract, they'd rather pay
their executives than shell out for coverage. Who would want to watch? The outfits are all alike and all equally horrible. Meanwhile a virtually all-male coaching
galaxy hovers over the enterprise sucking up cash and leaving blasted
confidence. </div>
<div sab="1947">
</div>
<div sab="1947">
As an outsider myself, I salute the young players (and the older over-the-hill but not players) who are looking at this situation as the opportunity it is. Good for Ostapenko! Good for Kasatkina! Good for Mirjana Lucic and Jo Konta and Elena Vesnina, good for the underdogs, all the "ovas" the <a href="http://www.tennisworldusa.org/news/news/Tennis_Interviews/42019/martina-hingis-fans-cannot-distinguish-today-s-players-their-names-all-end-in-ova-/" sab="1950" target="_blank">others might mistake for nonentities</a>. I'm not watching them either, but that don't mean a damn thing.</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div sab="22">
<div sab="1952">
<div sab="1967">
<div sab="1957">
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div sab="22">
<div sab="1954">
<div sab="1970">
<div sab="1961">
Sales update: All Famepunk books are now $2.99 each across all digital platforms. Writing update: I'm in year four of a book that takes place in the Soviet Union around the time of World War II; it isn't a tennis novel. But it will be good! Stay tuned for more about it.</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div sab="15">
<div sab="1956">
<div sab="1973">
<div sab="1965">
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div sab="19">
<div sab="1958">
<div sab="1976">
<div sab="1969">
<br /></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
Mehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09112613661290336699noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8266646095852048525.post-79113021149880177002015-09-13T19:53:00.002-07:002015-09-13T19:55:28.480-07:00Extended Quadruple Doubles Sale<div sab="126">
In celebration of the world's greatest player, her doubles partners and the rest, the sale continues <a href="https://www.smashwords.com/profile/view/famepunk" sab="322">at Smashwords</a>.</div>
<div sab="127">
</div>
<div class="separator" sab="207" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhnZJ3L0K0w4eBWEI6uVZ-H3ugNiTC7k6rRuJZcWRqxmJ8AjAhv01uNN2sKacooFmsdeP3C_fHLNiNqj6z2cXOe6jfGKfFOgFj9YdmIw2Wx-pMVu2HzcYP5N9gdmUYiDfJOZ5r6vG3ifco/s1600/pair.JPG" imageanchor="1" sab="208" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="171" sab="209" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhnZJ3L0K0w4eBWEI6uVZ-H3ugNiTC7k6rRuJZcWRqxmJ8AjAhv01uNN2sKacooFmsdeP3C_fHLNiNqj6z2cXOe6jfGKfFOgFj9YdmIw2Wx-pMVu2HzcYP5N9gdmUYiDfJOZ5r6vG3ifco/s400/pair.JPG" width="400" /></a></div>
<div sab="128">
</div>
Mehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09112613661290336699noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8266646095852048525.post-71718297468671576992015-09-01T21:26:00.003-07:002015-09-01T21:26:51.371-07:00On Super Grand Slam Sale<div sab="219">
For the duration of the 2015 US Open ALL THREE volumes of <strong sab="220">Famepunk </strong>are ON SALE FOR HALF PRICE at <a href="https://www.smashwords.com/profile/view/famepunk" sab="221">Smashwords</a>. Will there be another calendar year Grand Slam winner in women's tennis--the first in 27 years? While you wait to find out, you can relive the last time with a strong dose of fiction in <strong sab="222">Part 2: Middlemarch</strong>. It takes place on The Tour in 1988.</div>
<div sab="223">
</div>
<div class="separator" sab="305" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhUD9HjdQQS0MF2TfCw8GG0n2w4vAESFIabnIH_xeBiA89GlECG3D2yK-Q3suuzCrw0SBzTtaGtt_YiKgc4DMv8kRs_iU-zEjIWp3RVT3N5NO6PdyGxjzPkkIbKGl8Q2ns1HVsTRi7ro7s/s1600/petraserve.JPG" imageanchor="1" sab="306" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="317" sab="307" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhUD9HjdQQS0MF2TfCw8GG0n2w4vAESFIabnIH_xeBiA89GlECG3D2yK-Q3suuzCrw0SBzTtaGtt_YiKgc4DMv8kRs_iU-zEjIWp3RVT3N5NO6PdyGxjzPkkIbKGl8Q2ns1HVsTRi7ro7s/s320/petraserve.JPG" width="320" /></a></div>
Congratulations to the winners I watched on-line tonight--Nicole Gibbs (USA! USA), Kurumi Nara and the divine Petra Kvitova in her first night match in New York. <div sab="224">
</div>
<div sab="227">
</div>
<div sab="228">
</div>
Mehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09112613661290336699noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8266646095852048525.post-2904908870084797732014-11-29T11:19:00.001-08:002014-11-29T11:19:12.544-08:00Lesbian Bar Scene / New Excerpt<div sab="209">
Since last November, so for a year now, I've been working on a novel that takes place in the Soviet Union during the Stalin era. It's not <strong sab="210">Famepunk</strong>, in other words. I'd hoped to have finished it by now so that I could return to writing "the tennis novels" but it will take a while longer. And it will be good, I think! </div>
<div sab="211">
</div>
<div sab="212">
Meanwhile, to celebrate the relaunch of my main website under its new name--<a href="http://www.liz-mackie.com/" sab="213">liz-mackie.com</a>--I'm posting an excerpt from the upcoming (someday not too long from now) Part 4 of <strong sab="214">Famepunk</strong>, which will be called <strong sab="215">Against Theodosia</strong>. This is the COMPLETE chapter excerpted in the "coming soon" scene that's included at the very end of <strong sab="216">Part 2: Middlemarch</strong>. It takes place around Thanksgiving in New York City (so, seasonal) in 1990, and it's called "<a href="http://www.liz-mackie.com/FAMEPUNK/EXCERPTS/FP4.CUBBYHOLE.pdf" sab="235" target="_blank">In the Cubbyhole</a>."</div>
<div sab="220">
</div>
<div sab="221">
<img alt="Gay Pride parade" sab="222" src="http://www.annbannon.com/images/1990parade.jpg" /></div>
<div sab="223">
</div>
<div sab="224">
The picture here is from New York City in 1990 (except, summer) to set the tone. I had those shorts! The Cubbyhole is a lesbian bar in Greenwich Village which MAY OR MAY NOT have existed as <a href="http://www.liz-mackie.com/FAMEPUNK/EXCERPTS/FP4.CUBBYHOLE.pdf" sab="239">I've depicted it in 1990</a>; I thought it had but lately heard otherwise. </div>
<div sab="224">
</div>
<div sab="224">
Picture source is Ann Bannon's site; <a href="http://www.annbannon.com/index.html" sab="227" target="_blank">here is a link</a>, she is a hero of mine. Another interesting site I've found lately, also on Blogger, is devoted to <a href="http://lostwomynsspace.blogspot.com/" sab="231" target="_blank">Lost Womyn's Space</a> and it's worth a long visit.</div>
<div sab="224">
</div>
<div sab="224">
Happy Holidays dear readers--for me it's back to Odessa, 1941...</div>
Mehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09112613661290336699noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8266646095852048525.post-30344845463008161492014-07-08T20:14:00.002-07:002014-07-08T20:14:52.855-07:00On Sale in July at Smashwords<div sab="1118">
Until the end of July, customers at <a href="https://www.smashwords.com/profile/view/famepunk" sab="1120" target="_blank">Smashwords</a> can get all three volumes of <strong sab="1122">Famepunk</strong> for one low price of $7.50. The first two books are 50% off and the last one is FREE! Use code SSW50 at checkout.</div>
Mehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09112613661290336699noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8266646095852048525.post-43847489243576255992014-07-06T20:12:00.002-07:002014-07-07T17:45:51.693-07:00After Wimbledon | Ladies<div sab="115">
<div sab="970">
<div sab="605">
<div sab="972">
<div sab="1421">
<div sab="974">
<div sab="975">
<div sab="976">
<div sab="611">
The scary Canadian tennis player Eugenie Bouchard hasn't managed to inspire any warm feelings in me in the couple of years since her star began to rise. She is aggressive and antique portrait bust pretty, very Gilded Age; other <a href="http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/11052" sab="1053" target="_blank">fans of Edith Wharton</a> might have noted her exact-in-many-points resemblance to Undine Spragg. Yesterday at Wimbledon she played and was flattened 6-3 6-0 in the Ladies Single final. Even though I am a major Petra Kvitova fan, here was my chance to loosen the heartstrings and sympathize with the kid a little; I didn't, I enjoyed watching North American princess type Eugenie Bouchard get thumped and sent packing in less than an hour by "my" player. Very much!</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div sab="115">
<div sab="972">
<div sab="608">
<div sab="976">
<div sab="1427">
<div sab="981">
<div sab="983">
<div sab="985">
<div sab="621">
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" sab="977" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody sab="978">
<tr sab="979"><td sab="980" style="text-align: center;"><div sab="981">
<div sab="1433">
<div sab="988">
<div sab="991">
<div sab="994">
<div sab="631">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjHEcYYE3RRAuap9hVySKS8PIru9_zv4mm4YcaMOqv-qi0culoVMG603ZIORov-rQeONgGBLOAv_6iwcY_ZtfEe0qkyO082GhidXDXG2OGhWeQ_QIce3DYcF_10sQfTtY0Hs6fK4uWAdSI/s1600/petra2.jpg" imageanchor="1" sab="285" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjHEcYYE3RRAuap9hVySKS8PIru9_zv4mm4YcaMOqv-qi0culoVMG603ZIORov-rQeONgGBLOAv_6iwcY_ZtfEe0qkyO082GhidXDXG2OGhWeQ_QIce3DYcF_10sQfTtY0Hs6fK4uWAdSI/s1600/petra2.jpg" height="212" sab="286" width="320" /></a></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</td></tr>
<tr sab="984"><td class="tr-caption" sab="985" style="text-align: center;"><div sab="986">
<div sab="1439">
<div sab="995">
<div sab="999">
<div sab="1003">
<div sab="641">
<em sab="987">Petra Wins Again</em></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<div sab="976">
<div sab="613">
<div sab="990">
<div sab="1444">
<div sab="1001">
<div sab="1006">
<div sab="1011">
<div sab="650">
But ever since, when I think about what she was up against, thinking back on that match, I've felt more and more sorry for Genie Bouchard. In my mind's eye I can picture her, a pretty blonde girl with visor, braid, racquet, white multi-million dollar Nike contract tennis dress, the works--she's on one side of the net. And on the other side, I know, is Petra Kvitova, I've watched the match twice (on-line, via ESPN embedded on the Wimbledon site all the way through the finals, all courts, with replay, very civilized and great despite buffering problems). And I see Petra Kvitova; she just hit a crosscourt forehand. At the same time a spirit photography-style double exposure occurs in my memory and hovering all around her I see white brick walls and parts of industrial structures--concrete loading docks, power plant smokestacks, thick steel beams with rivets for their alien double spines. As I recall, I see <a href="http://www.thestar.com/sports/tennis/2014/07/06/eugenie_bouchard_lost_more_than_just_final_at_wimbledon.html" sab="1035" target="_blank">poor Genie Bouchard</a> with no weapons but a strong chin versus some kind of dark Satanic Mill, a human female mega-factory for the production of another Wimbledon title.</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div sab="115">
<div sab="979">
<div sab="619">
<div sab="995">
<div sab="1450">
<div sab="1008">
<div sab="1014">
<div sab="1020">
<div sab="660">
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div sab="115">
<div sab="981">
<div sab="622">
<div sab="999">
<div sab="1455">
<div sab="1014">
<div sab="1021">
<div sab="1028">
<div sab="669">
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
Mehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09112613661290336699noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8266646095852048525.post-85305352807766013152014-03-02T17:15:00.003-08:002014-03-02T17:32:42.177-08:00Hard, Fast and Beautiful<div sab="126">
<div sab="517">
<div sab="1082">
<div sab="944">
At a time (now, 2014) when women’s professional tennis is so rife with incompetence, gutlessness, malingering and fakery as to be practically unwatchable, I’ve turned to The Vaults. It’s possible to find quite a few interesting old matches on-line; the Australian Open posted <a href="http://vault.australianopentv.com/" sab="377" target="_blank">some great ones</a> on its web site that I watched during this last tournament, for instance.
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div sab="127">
<div sab="520">
<div sab="1086">
<div sab="949">
<br /></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div sab="128">
<div sab="522">
<div sab="1089">
<div sab="953">
And then <a href="http://www.famepunk.com/" sab="129" target="_blank">there’s fiction</a>.
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div sab="130">
<div sab="525">
<div sab="1093">
<div sab="958">
<br /></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div sab="131">
<div sab="527">
<div sab="1096">
<div sab="962">
<strong sab="433">Hard, Fast and Beautiful</strong> is a 1951 film directed by Ida Lupino (who was also an actress, of course) for RKO Pictures. It traces the meteoric career of a young tennis player who wins the women’s singles title at the US Open, only to find her hopes and dreams jeopardized and almost crushed by the machinations of her horrible mother. I will spoil the ending now by saying that in the end the young player quits and goes off in the arms of her fiancée, who promises to be a good earner.
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div sab="131">
<div sab="530">
<div sab="1100">
<div sab="967">
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="separator" sab="288" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<span id="goog_734577877" sab="1102"></span><span id="goog_734577878" sab="1103"></span><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Hard-Fast-Beautiful-Claire-Trevor/dp/B009OU4NNW/ref=sr_1_1?s=instant-video&ie=UTF8&qid=1393809642&sr=1-1&keywords=hard+fast+and+beautiful" sab="1105" target="_blank"><img alt="http://www.amazon.com/Hard-Fast-Beautiful-Claire-Trevor/dp/B009OU4NNW/ref=sr_1_1?s=instant-video&ie=UTF8&qid=1393809642&sr=1-1&keywords=hard+fast+and+beautiful" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgROWeOcW6KDLe6ATRrd4PFnthSPLdTyD3GJgF8V-OI1c7kGTdR8yckAMjII9BU8ZZ97vogQaE1UghpgnkmFnnzUACmvbv8-7SYQzu6hGOr3n2lrnSHlxwk24a8NwiIbvXCCuriZBsCnTg/s1600/hardfast.jpg" height="400" sab="290" width="262" /></a></div>
<div sab="132">
<div sab="535">
<div sab="1110">
<div sab="976">
<br /></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div sab="135">
<div sab="537">
<div sab="1113">
<div sab="980">
The mother, played by Claire Trevor, is the star of the story. She is a cold bitch with a rotten character and an addiction to status, smoking, cocktails, fur coats, fancy hotels and basic cash money. Which is a problem for her because in the “pre-professional era” of international tennis, which didn’t actually end until 1968, tournament play was reserved for amateur athletes. The four “majors”—Wimbledon, Roland Garros, the United States Open, the Australian Championships—and other title events around the US and the world, did not offer prize money. If you won, you got a cup. If you wanted to make money playing tennis, you went “pro” and played against other pros on one of the exhibition circuits. (In 1952’s “Pat and Mike,” Katherine Hepburn’s character plays pro tennis, appearing at one point against Alice Marble who won many Grand Slam titles as an amateur; she also spied against the Nazis until she got shot in the back and had to go home.) Pro matches could be quite competitive but professional tennis wasn’t considered or expected to offer true competition in the sense that amateur tennis did.
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div sab="136">
<div sab="539">
<div sab="1116">
<div sab="984">
<br /></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div sab="137">
<div sab="541">
<div sab="1119">
<div sab="988">
So poor Millie Farley (the mother) does what she can to leverage her champion daughter’s world-class but non-paying titles into a living. She joins forces with a suave scumbag talent scout-manager-promoter and in no time at all her daughter’s getting free racquets, free clothes, and big checks made out to “Cash” from major hotel chains who want her as a guest. There’s a big mother-daughter confrontation when young Florence Farley wins Wimbledon and comes back drunk from the post-finals ball to their huge suite at the Piccadilly Hotel, where she reveals that none of the other girls get to stay in huge suites and that she’s being ostracized because of her ill-gotten gains. Millie doesn’t want Florence to turn pro—she just wants her to keep winning so that they can keep traveling around the world in luxury. But eventually (see above) this becomes too much to ask and Florence quits. Millie has a downfall.
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div sab="138">
<div sab="543">
<div sab="1122">
<div sab="992">
<br /></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div sab="139">
<div sab="545">
<div sab="1125">
<div sab="996">
This movie, its fine acting and dramatic qualities aside, offers a wonderful look back at a vanished world. The US Open scenes were filmed on location at Forest Hills, right in the grass court stadium, and also at the Forest Hills Inn (which still exists, though not as a hotel now, it’s co-ops). All the play is with wooden racquets and it’s extremely good play, complete with lots of strategy and “American Twist” serves. In one montage all the old East Coast tournaments show up—Philadelphia, East Hampton, a couple in New Jersey, there was even one in Essex, Massachusetts. Upper-class white East Coast Yankees (redundant, redundant) coming out to watch white women play tennis, with no money casting its sullying shadow over the enterprise, pure competition—this was the picture of a dream world.
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div sab="503">
<div sab="550">
<div sab="1128">
<div sab="1000">
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://regoforestpreservation.blogspot.com/2012/03/forest-hills-inns-100th-anniversary.html" sab="1130" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img alt="http://regoforestpreservation.blogspot.com/2012/03/forest-hills-inns-100th-anniversary.html" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgUYJ_Mz99CVEyNKCGO3jBQ8zSrfpuRxDdFSBduhuR2JwNhHRa5O9rWDituPpsoo-778pmo59q4uW32yyjNFuH48rjLgetNMe3WlveH-NItQppVL7dMVT0o774K7OiSgvxja0mkrEeq7KI/s1600/Station+Square+%2526+Forest+Hills+Inn+Postcard+Circa+Early+20s.jpg" height="200" sab="566" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Forest Hills, Queens</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<div class="separator" sab="504" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div sab="141">
<div sab="557">
<div sab="1135">
<div sab="1008">
Of course people always took money. Perks. There must have been a lot of gambling. Match-fixing. The pure amateur was a figure of myth long before the sport was professionalized. Poor Millie, all alone at the end, the bad mother. She has a bad greed problem and that made her a bad person by the stated standards of her day. But looking at the ending of <strong sab="434">Hard, Fast and Beautiful</strong> from the perspective of 2014, when Dominika Cibulkova (a nice girl, no question) got $1,350,000 for winning six games in the Australian Open final, it’s harder to judge, hard not to sympathize.
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div sab="142">
<div sab="560">
<div sab="1139">
<div sab="1013">
<br /></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div sab="143">
<div sab="562">
<div sab="1142">
<div sab="1017">
Maybe the greedy people were simply ahead of their time.
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
Mehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09112613661290336699noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8266646095852048525.post-74911639375700800552013-12-26T19:41:00.001-08:002013-12-26T19:49:34.681-08:00Partly Free Until EpiphanyHappy Boxing Day! In honor of the season, until January 6, 2014 I will be giving away FREE print copies of <a href="http://www.famepunk.com/home/thelutheran" target="_blank">Famepunk Part 3: The Lutheran</a>. Just send your mailing address of choice to <a href="mailto:liz@famepunk.com" target="_blank">liz@famepunk.com</a> and give it a week or so.<br />
<br />
At your request, I'll send you a BONUS digital copy. . .and if you've already bought a copy of <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Famepunk-Lutheran-3-Liz-Mackie/dp/1494342359/ref=la_B009Y8N6ZU_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1387506032&sr=1-1" target="_blank">The Lutheran</a>, please let me know. I'll send you a copy of something else. <br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgiyXfKxdMD3L6Nsolf6SZZ39iHMeDxYKu_rezuGRzL5o7YYXZJ1oNEO6xnJ3iCUor6rAAcNugav2qbuhYQEw08boN3OuLg-WEE1mg3g6swYO7U_mgSIVHsbDAAcuyCsWrs4WidPF2Lr4Y/s1600/amahl+copy.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgiyXfKxdMD3L6Nsolf6SZZ39iHMeDxYKu_rezuGRzL5o7YYXZJ1oNEO6xnJ3iCUor6rAAcNugav2qbuhYQEw08boN3OuLg-WEE1mg3g6swYO7U_mgSIVHsbDAAcuyCsWrs4WidPF2Lr4Y/s320/amahl+copy.jpg" width="319" /></a></div>
Mehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09112613661290336699noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8266646095852048525.post-85184764108913447212013-12-09T19:10:00.002-08:002013-12-20T04:50:19.448-08:00A Modern Holiday Classic (Updated)I spent all summer into October working on a long chapter from Against Theodosia, the next volume of <a href="http://www.famepunk.com/" target="_blank"><strong>Famepunk</strong></a>. I called it The Lutheran. When it was done, I put it aside for a month. My plan was to publish the chapter as a Christmas-themed Kindle Single and use it to "draw people into" the rest of the series at the buying time of year. <br />
<br />
So I spent part of the fall slacking off from being a financially unsuccessful writer. I read a lot and watched movies, it was wonderful. Then I got involved in another writing project, unrelated to Famepunk but still, coincidentally, with Russian and Jewish characters.
I was really getting into it but then ran into Thanksgiving. At which point the first Sunday in Advent, my deadline, loomed.<br />
<br />
With the help of kind readers (Claudia, Rags & James) I was able to make pretty quick work of the final revisions. The cover design went very smoothly; in PhotoShop I was able to copy over the basics of the previous cover designs, having learned how to do this while making them. Then, on the last morning of the last minute before publishing, I decided that it wasn't a chapter from Part 3--it was a part itself. Which makes it <strong><a href="http://www.famepunk.com/home/thelutheran" target="_blank">Part 3: The Lutheran</a></strong>.
<br />
<br />
Like a flash, I finish the cover, prepare all the text files, fiddle fiddle fiddle upload and quickly publish digital versions for <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Lutheran-Famepunk-Liz-Mackie-ebook/dp/B00H1GR1GW/ref=tmm_kin_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&sr=1-1&qid=1387506032" target="_blank">Kindle</a> & <a href="https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/384427" target="_blank">Smashwords</a>. A week later, Amazon lists <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Famepunk-Lutheran-3-Liz-Mackie/dp/1494342359/ref=la_B009Y8N6ZU_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1387506032&sr=1-1" target="_blank">the elegant-122 page print paperback version</a>, a nice little slim little self-contained story that skips ahead in the Famepunk chronology to the very end of 1991 when the heroine, Emma Jasohn, is about to have a baby.
To some degree, the whole thing really is a Christmas story.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgn_hk_qXPOCyiklayrB9y-L9gZ7g-R5w-KqVsGP0j1j04Ipu8egT4-FPF0wZAwLWKFnevzMpl5xNIgAGjFZv9lG8lQO1__WTF7hB-ZTTudgsFvawWGDd4syZ17iUdjTSfIUGnlBBsU35U/s1600/santa.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgn_hk_qXPOCyiklayrB9y-L9gZ7g-R5w-KqVsGP0j1j04Ipu8egT4-FPF0wZAwLWKFnevzMpl5xNIgAGjFZv9lG8lQO1__WTF7hB-ZTTudgsFvawWGDd4syZ17iUdjTSfIUGnlBBsU35U/s320/santa.jpg" width="240" /></a></div>
<br />
It's also a comedy about the Protestant Church. The lead character (The Lutheran) is a stranger to the Famepunk story who gets hired as Emma's emergency German tutor. He's German and so is his (also pregnant) wife, they both attend Union Theological Seminary where they're honing their skills and qualifications for the Lutheran priesthood. So this is the part of my subversive lesbian global-historial romance that's told from the point of view of a heterosexual male. <br />
<br />
Technically, I felt it was the best choice, in large part because it absolved me of having to write so intimate an account of "the process" as I might have attempted otherwise. It wouldn't have been very good. Third trimester pregnancy, amniotic fluids, contractions, labor pains, crowning, placenta--what do I know? I think undergoing this experience sounds horrible.<br />
<br />
The thing is, I have never had a baby. I've never wanted to have a baby, care for a baby, raise a baby, at all. Neither does Emma Jasohn, she is unwillingly pregnant, carrying a baby she doesn't want to full term because the people who control her life plan to profit from this baby--which, in her case, will be a celebrity baby, since she's famous and the baby's father is, too. But while I was writing this part of the story I thought a lot about how many girls and woman have babies they don't want, every day the unwanted are born to miserable mothers imprisoned by their own circumstances. <br />
<br />
And still those mothers and children turn out okay all the time. So, Merry Christmas...buy a book!Mehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09112613661290336699noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8266646095852048525.post-86341294617383021442013-06-18T17:25:00.001-07:002013-08-21T14:54:22.258-07:00Avatars!<iframe width="500" height="300" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/vKky9exCNz4?feature=player_detailpage" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>Mehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09112613661290336699noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8266646095852048525.post-63932784492225311052013-05-03T19:48:00.000-07:002013-05-08T12:37:51.073-07:00Difficult to Categorize | 7 | Have I Transgressed?Practically at the very moment of release from my strangulating 6-month Kindle Select exclusive, I finally published the <a href="https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/310968">Smashwords edition of Middlemarch</a>. Which means that in a few more days it will be available for iPads and Nooks and phones and everything—digital saturation. I’ve been all over the Kindle Direct Publishing site and the Smashwords dashboard among the files at my accounts doing this. I’ve checked the sales data. I haven’t made any sales at all.
<br />
<br />
But I persevere! After two weeks of tinkering I’m finally happy again with the front page of <a href="http://www.rip-tv.com/">my web site</a>. I’m content to stop, despite the dead javascript in Her Attractive Pain and <a href="http://www.rip-tv.com/cloak/c43a.htm">Cloak</a> which I just don’t know how to fix (and it’s still alive in Explorer). My work so far is there, the best I could do at the time. Of course it’s not everything. I’ve got cartons of writing on paper. Lots of the old stuff is on typing paper—typed!—and a great deal else (including a novel) printed from files stored inaccessibly throughout a deep wooden desk drawer full of different-sized disks; I’ve got hardware to match piled in corners and closets, busted and unsupported. To put more old work on-line, I’ll have to re-type it.
<br />
<br />
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.rip-tv.com/hap/page1.htm" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img border="0" height="247" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEglj2Q8Sqb3WZqwuGAyAQKwU36ux1bs-VtOpisJXPrUaVdesExGJxjXSBI7Kfu3lqjpsDc-St-KVH60aE5ugP39gROoDFXVI6YyyFJfhzLS7udS6V7P7X0ZjKJ17ok-tm5U-NHaq1akRLw/s320/deep.jpg" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Throw rice!</span></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
In early 2001, when I could still open some of those old files, I converted two of them into web projects to build out RIP-TV beyond <a href="http://rip-tv.diaryland.com/older.html" target="_blank">the diaryland site</a>. An episodic autobiographical piece about my luck (bad) with women, One and Others was written and pieced together over the course of many years. The web version is the first complete one; it’s organized around several views of a painting of my sister’s that I keep above my desk. The title is stolen from a small-scale wooden sculpture by Louise Bourgeois that I first saw with my after-college girlfriend (who’s in the story) at MoMA in <a href="http://nihilsentimentalgia09.wordpress.com/tag/louise-bourgeois/" target="_blank">the 1982 one-woman retrospective</a>, an unforgettable show. Not long ago I saw One and Others again, it’s on Madison Avenue in the Whitney’s permanent collection, near the bathrooms; I recognized it right away coming out. In tribute to its undimmed allure, I’ve replaced the Soviet work propaganda that I’ve been using as the linking “tile” at RIP-TV with a photo of the thing itself.
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<img border="0" height="275" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEijFoumxxwqxPG5CLsYYBdgjaBPltJufkiMiK9A5XcmAqS3sksGhq1eapgSvtk2U-OOe7Ch3NgGEbIid50FXm_h8bFNWkWTdUlF8agsSO1vSp1_YoJ4aDItzv6o6xm1u5sAMZaieLNcC5E/s320/bourgeois_louise_oneandothers_56_43_640.jpg" width="320" /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
The site’s other pre-digital story, Girls School, I wrote start to finish in the fall of 1995 as my contribution to a lesbian writing workshop I was taking with nice lesbian friends in Central Square, Cambridge. It was composed under the influence of a cover-to-cover Columbus Day weekend reading of Harold Bloom’s The Western Canon that I did on my own. Which (the Western canon, especially Macbeth) remains to me what Girls School is about, although it is a lesbian porno climaxing in a sex ritual. I did a serial on-line publication, each installment illustrated with a collage made from an image in the Taschen paperback 1000 Nudes. For years I’ve had the finished version linked to a lesbian pair study from the same source with a Constructivist graphic cut into one of the bodies, an image I consider ample warning; I’ve kept and cropped it for the latest front page design.
<br /><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgQKuMfXvEslceo4C54_ryBQEfL2JieHY2jeolPt39euDUAK9dO_k8tHlW9fvULaU7vQPYPQLrHg_hPGP1SoG68dT3n6f_ynm9tnhX_EK0id5iQcX0b-_iRAd-4V05v_pl3CmDyF81NvJo/s1600/russia.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgQKuMfXvEslceo4C54_ryBQEfL2JieHY2jeolPt39euDUAK9dO_k8tHlW9fvULaU7vQPYPQLrHg_hPGP1SoG68dT3n6f_ynm9tnhX_EK0id5iQcX0b-_iRAd-4V05v_pl3CmDyF81NvJo/s320/russia.jpg" width="226" /></a></div>
<br />
May 2013 and I’ve had those two stories on my web page which I’ve shared widely for over a decade; I always put my web page address on my business resume, too. But somehow until recently I thought So what? about that. I wasn't unaware of how I was outing myself, but I was indifferent. The lesbian thing wasn’t really my focus; I was interested in writing in different voices and crafting hypertexts and creating on-screen beauty. In my work the lesbianism was content, it was just one type of subject matter among many contributing to the flow of words: this is how I saw it. Maybe writing Middlemarch changed me—anyhow my point of view has changed. The lesbianism looks extremely significant to me at the present time. Of course I’ve always realized that vast numbers of people can’t tolerate lesbians at all, not even the marrying child-rearing kind and certainly not the sex ritual enacting kind. I don’t care at all about these people’s feelings, but being more aware of them makes me care more about lesbians. I want to support and encourage lesbians in their lesbianism through an offering of literature. I hope it helps.
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEghRsv1PntCHNLAu_EJjEsyN2WgfG1f9yaoR88m2EkITc_1FvXCWxxSYFrzgdRe91HFiMHfFBp7zc5yiuvXIawzYrmAGaGV0ijNdCGcpqfPu5V2hOz8VxjXwmXO252B_SccDN0vG_kngD8/s1600/oao.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="190" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEghRsv1PntCHNLAu_EJjEsyN2WgfG1f9yaoR88m2EkITc_1FvXCWxxSYFrzgdRe91HFiMHfFBp7zc5yiuvXIawzYrmAGaGV0ijNdCGcpqfPu5V2hOz8VxjXwmXO252B_SccDN0vG_kngD8/s200/oao.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<br />
So at last I’m posting Middlemarch on Smashwords, and here comes the category choice. In support of lesbianism I go with Fiction—Gay & Lesbian—Lesbian for the primary listing and Fiction—<a href="http://whatisfamepunk.blogspot.com/2012/07/historical-novel.html" target="_blank">Historical</a>—USA for the back-up. Literary Fiction I passed by, as planned; Women’s Fiction tempted me, Women’s Fiction—Feminist tempted me. The category that sounded most fitting, I didn’t choose either: Fiction—Literature—Transgressional. But the first time I saw that category, it seemed to flash.
<br />
<br />
It felt almost too fitting. What doesn't Famepunk Part 2: Middlemarch transgress? Look what it does to the historical record, for starters! Crossing lines everywhere, crossing all the lines, violating all the boundaries, walking into lines of nightsticks on every hand: my book does this with its tits out. It’s ridiculously transgressive. I mused. Transgressional: maybe these are my people.
<br />
<br />
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiFH6-VDUbgro0W4RHuI-FvYdUb2aJfuoZTI8P1ujqTynK1U3eGO2R_DbrrlGyNL7W8kbbYqHSlSYH1oobSNER6DmAQqsKpz6qzp4A8dHsafuI2AnLItllZNv2mjHJYaf1QczKAu3kmKKw/s1600/teeth.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiFH6-VDUbgro0W4RHuI-FvYdUb2aJfuoZTI8P1ujqTynK1U3eGO2R_DbrrlGyNL7W8kbbYqHSlSYH1oobSNER6DmAQqsKpz6qzp4A8dHsafuI2AnLItllZNv2mjHJYaf1QczKAu3kmKKw/s320/teeth.jpg" width="258" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Me</span></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
Then I thought, Hey, wait a minute. What’s with Transgressional? What happened to Subversive? So I looked and there’s no category line for Fiction—Literature—Subversive or for anything Subversive. That category—a genuine category, one of long standing and high repute in many circles, historically important circles—is gone, it’s missing; Subversive is history. To say, I have set out to undermine a faulty structure and help to bring it down isn’t the choice now. Instead, I transgress: the focus of agency shifts from the structure to the property lines, from cores to boundaries, from danger to nuisance, naughtiness. Why should this be? Subversive is maybe passé, too blunt and opinionated, too butch, too innocent, maybe; Transgressional offers the <em>almost</em> to subversive’s <em>too much</em> for the sensitive 21st-century ear. Maybe this is the thinking, that Subversive has evolved, that it’s gained self-awareness and done some re-branding and now it’s Transgressional. Its politics informed by psychology, recognizing protest as neurotic symptom, it prods the reasonable walls until they bite.
<br />
<br />
I’d have loved to label Fampunk as subversive literature (which it might be) and fight it out with the competitive anarchists and would-be Kaczynskis for a readership.
Mehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09112613661290336699noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8266646095852048525.post-39182807432375220942013-04-25T19:25:00.003-07:002013-04-26T08:48:55.499-07:00Difficult to Categorize | 6 | Is it Literary Fiction?To be truthful, to be honest with myself, I fear that Famepunk belongs in the worst category of all. In my secret opinion it couldn't be worse. <br />
<br />
To me, Literary Fiction sounds awful. The words conjoined, they look okay at first and then, no, they also look awful. This is the category with the gold leaf encrusted, the greedy of glittering prizes one. Literary Fiction: boom, there it is, dropped down and stuck on alphabetical lists smack between dozens of choices where its pretentious “as-opposed-to” tone insults most writers of fiction, actually; I think the majority of us hope to be read by the ages. Here is a box I’d much rather not click—except that I’d still like to qualify as a serious fiction-writer whose work is worth reading. <br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhBrs61dBm16xNn4gO7CXY7GWWxhaKF7hiLjU7eEXAAJS9fTRpB_-HLBsc8sfx4SY36WlM_YCIwYTMfLlIZO6JYQ0BXjSvejR-iNJYPljojHOqIUDn2ZD9akWuQH8o9rt8OAhyphenhyphen7ddCnXbs/s1600/edith+wharton.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 0em; margin-right: 0em;"><img alt="" border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhBrs61dBm16xNn4gO7CXY7GWWxhaKF7hiLjU7eEXAAJS9fTRpB_-HLBsc8sfx4SY36WlM_YCIwYTMfLlIZO6JYQ0BXjSvejR-iNJYPljojHOqIUDn2ZD9akWuQH8o9rt8OAhyphenhyphen7ddCnXbs/s200/edith+wharton.jpg" title="Edith Wharton" width="172" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhNaL2QlxSWXVT6vBGIoktqBEj2CrppFOB9ALsyPZ8taVNYGWQgOLPr12JGYtFdtkGzqzY26E6BCJhP6ydTXGGomp5w-RRAGyn0i6ng1SP4P-1OxyTZ-azacU2jKT5QWFGq2PNYg7aXEac/s1600/Willa+Cather.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 0em; margin-right: 0em;"><img alt="" border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhNaL2QlxSWXVT6vBGIoktqBEj2CrppFOB9ALsyPZ8taVNYGWQgOLPr12JGYtFdtkGzqzY26E6BCJhP6ydTXGGomp5w-RRAGyn0i6ng1SP4P-1OxyTZ-azacU2jKT5QWFGq2PNYg7aXEac/s200/Willa+Cather.jpg" title="Willa Cather" width="180" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjzOxGiVlIvn_5TUC8VynwOoekWy89B1BbsPFdOjmPAEP5WRM-H0JzFmBw3i58h0YHFdW2p4RxZwNo5Lb9z7DSgTWrkRG4lAhYxR7Ph9L6egpPJiiq-eXjr5wbgRjZgBPJ7ndpJrFriH5k/s1600/Eudora+Welty.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 0em; margin-right: 0em;"><img alt="" border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjzOxGiVlIvn_5TUC8VynwOoekWy89B1BbsPFdOjmPAEP5WRM-H0JzFmBw3i58h0YHFdW2p4RxZwNo5Lb9z7DSgTWrkRG4lAhYxR7Ph9L6egpPJiiq-eXjr5wbgRjZgBPJ7ndpJrFriH5k/s200/Eudora+Welty.jpg" title="Eudora Welty" width="160" /></a></div>
<br />
It’s a quandary. <br />
<br />
Because however putrid Literary Fiction sounds and is as a category, <a href="http://www.famepunk.com/home" target="_blank">Famepunk</a> is literary fiction. That is, it’s written specifically in relation and response to many other works of fiction, old & new, high & low, but especially in reaction to great literature; it’s a book about literature and about itself as literature. See, for instance, the title of Part 2. Or that in writing the many sex scenes in <a href="http://www.famepunk.com/home/middlemarch" target="_blank">Middlemarch</a> I was directly influenced by D.H. Lawrence and especially The Rainbow (<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2011/mar/19/rainbow-lawrence-rachel-cusk-rereading" target="_blank">banned in Britain 1915-26</a>), and maybe too much by Joseph Conrad whom I was reading devotedly last year. Sometimes I let influences like this guide conscious choices; mostly I was being as descriptive as possible, without any particular regard to influence, of the vivid scenes in my imagination which I was taking down as best I could. But I’m a reader (movie buff, play-goer, art lover, opera-to-rock music fan) of very long standing and somehow, I believe, everything in there is emerging and recombining into Famepunk. Experience is influence, too—everything is influence. All the material is autobiographical. <br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi6dDWBXEAZ9W4Rrsg3HZNPVAy_TCvPbS2aKDR3C7dk_hngQfgqWCOzBaGPbCRrCcOr_2wqbaG7NBIyJo9Y3398T4LQE_1wZISZK4Lyu8J3YW9yw8CAAd7_SUP42_fiNNiSJflggcGY0Z4/s1600/Truman+Capote.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 0em; margin-right: 0em;"><img alt="" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi6dDWBXEAZ9W4Rrsg3HZNPVAy_TCvPbS2aKDR3C7dk_hngQfgqWCOzBaGPbCRrCcOr_2wqbaG7NBIyJo9Y3398T4LQE_1wZISZK4Lyu8J3YW9yw8CAAd7_SUP42_fiNNiSJflggcGY0Z4/s1600/Truman+Capote.jpg" title="Truman Capote" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgCbNVJfAMWX-bwI8Tq8N5htUZJkw884SkJmD-8xLzfUFHZAtwXqsB9zvRkbt2lmanor2ql4ZfWeGmXB0rKtB6wjNNKxTf0Y2NxWRude9bD6sEKP8-16uDidHO9EGxZP5r62dyJiBHkW-c/s1600/Norman+Mailer.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 0em; margin-right: 0em;"><img alt="" border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgCbNVJfAMWX-bwI8Tq8N5htUZJkw884SkJmD-8xLzfUFHZAtwXqsB9zvRkbt2lmanor2ql4ZfWeGmXB0rKtB6wjNNKxTf0Y2NxWRude9bD6sEKP8-16uDidHO9EGxZP5r62dyJiBHkW-c/s200/Norman+Mailer.jpg" title="Norman Mailer" width="173" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiK4kJBNRGX_CSfXnatJOObvIr8mzIIqVCIuJE5qU5BAjP7_h_3tVKwxrA-Ta7OFo7CL9HXLL7EUejOyMAykOQM5GBO1w0wE-Qlr_1sdejKfSVGRFdsFmDX0PoR-xD_Ww8Tzb9OYAJ9QvU/s1600/Philip-Roth.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 0em; margin-right: 0em;"><img alt="" border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiK4kJBNRGX_CSfXnatJOObvIr8mzIIqVCIuJE5qU5BAjP7_h_3tVKwxrA-Ta7OFo7CL9HXLL7EUejOyMAykOQM5GBO1w0wE-Qlr_1sdejKfSVGRFdsFmDX0PoR-xD_Ww8Tzb9OYAJ9QvU/s200/Philip-Roth.jpg" title="Philip Roth" width="169" /></a></div>
<br />
Maybe for that reason, I think of Famepunk as my personal contribution to literature. Is that pretentious? I don’t know. Pathetic? I don’t think so—not in my opinion. I think I’m doing well and that my writing is clear and straightforward and not pretentious at all. I know it’s different but then I mean it to be different. I intend it to be art. Am I ambitious to be classed among the great, inspired and visionary writers? Yes. Obviously I want this. Why not? What a scandal it would be otherwise—how could I want less than this when both heroines in my novel, among their few redeeming features, are great achievers and visionaries? Should I, their creator, aspire to be less? Never. <br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhXJKbOdCWgaFbfvsaOA___Z12yl1QbYaMxBXEMsGcRhPrc6nlp1Xx1efIJSEFhpzDyuV8wEeofFWFRu7yfKJrlu9QkR6fiw3Pxbjes56flnEMadVrNBNQLnNq1J-o4m7_nEWCJiEm5By0/s1600/Joan+Didion.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 0em; margin-right: 0em;"><img alt="" border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhXJKbOdCWgaFbfvsaOA___Z12yl1QbYaMxBXEMsGcRhPrc6nlp1Xx1efIJSEFhpzDyuV8wEeofFWFRu7yfKJrlu9QkR6fiw3Pxbjes56flnEMadVrNBNQLnNq1J-o4m7_nEWCJiEm5By0/s200/Joan+Didion.jpg" title="Joan Didion" unselectable="on" width="173" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgLzgS0-7m4CjJKHevu4oAlGu31OvzPKAjb3n6SUT9c4DnQhRWDVHIrMKMNoSwwBEo4yTC34vU0B6nLowqSjxhHPWhL3kikICnmO3uJobskKoSq5uPmTZtA-RC7Ixi5SAIz60pxraO5yeA/s1600/Toni_Morrison.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 0em; margin-right: 0em;"><img alt="" border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgLzgS0-7m4CjJKHevu4oAlGu31OvzPKAjb3n6SUT9c4DnQhRWDVHIrMKMNoSwwBEo4yTC34vU0B6nLowqSjxhHPWhL3kikICnmO3uJobskKoSq5uPmTZtA-RC7Ixi5SAIz60pxraO5yeA/s200/Toni_Morrison.jpg" title="Toni Morrison" width="170" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEigCJsvPKxtecH-LKXcbe5hCI-3ZYuRn-TTSxF43JgXouUKbvgPPbVNnPli0999atDnZfK5eWP6sOteZbsJSH34STppQttbV7Qw1Z8IWL1koqvrh3_I5VRdzh_2FcnFRdmsilsQgfoiDsM/s1600/imagesCAU5B6YX.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 0em; margin-right: 0em;"><img alt="" border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEigCJsvPKxtecH-LKXcbe5hCI-3ZYuRn-TTSxF43JgXouUKbvgPPbVNnPli0999atDnZfK5eWP6sOteZbsJSH34STppQttbV7Qw1Z8IWL1koqvrh3_I5VRdzh_2FcnFRdmsilsQgfoiDsM/s200/imagesCAU5B6YX.jpg" title="Joyce Carol Oates" width="183" /></a></div>
<br />
So am I untrue to my quest, my gestalt, if I choose something “less than” Literary Fiction to define not just the book but its reason springing from within myself for being? Or can I just say, honestly, you know, I still don’t like the way it sounds, namely snooty—as in entitled—and awful. Not to mention how the label has become practically a by-word for fakery and corruption and that it’s completely impossible not to picture a world encircled by writers sitting at desks in their faculty offices, slathering one another’s review copies with rapturous blurbs. They always mention genius. I can’t embrace the category because I feel so alienated from everyone who’d feel fitted to a T, who wouldn’t even think twice. Writers who wouldn’t accept anything less than a shot at a place in the pantheon—that rogues' gallery. Mehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09112613661290336699noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8266646095852048525.post-55694431974220790662013-04-24T18:38:00.002-07:002013-05-03T20:53:12.587-07:00Difficult to Categorize | 5 | Is it Horror?I won’t lie. The tally so far is a gypsy curse, one pair of poltergeist dance pumps, a goblin child, at least two ghosts and some working, profit-driven witches. <a href="http://www.famepunk.com/home/middlemarch" target="_blank">Famepunk</a> contains elements of horror, fantasy and the supernatural. Although it’s not about any of that, not enough to advertise at least, the horror’s essential, peripheral yet central to the plot. I didn’t plan it this way, it’s just how the story developed—I was glad, though, and really went along as I was writing. Especially witches I was glad to get in there.
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://stevelensman.hubpages.com/hub/Witches-on-the-Screen#" target="_blank"><img border="0" height="223" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgcoOe1CZBf6ouC-6uGoVFyXX_XhC_2GI3ycv7BNDUur9OYRRjXxn6ri_orAhEB9oYVG_YRxVX16rAVw6O0GrHW2ZnGyeRB32-HBe-KkUGXg-0ng6xgWObYaLdqOpyzReT0z4BqEC5evuU/s400/novak.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
Because <a href="http://www.amnesty.org/en/ai_search?keywords=witchcraft&op=Search&form_id=search_theme_form&form_token=87f035b3d2a73f533e75e9e79c1b2cef" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank">unless they really hate them</a>, people love witches! They read about them constantly. A lot of people start with Harry Potter books and just keep going, maybe. A year or two ago I checked the Paperback Fiction Bestseller list in the New York Times and about 2/3rds dealt with witches and warlocks and witch clans. When they started showing up in the middle of Middlemarch, I thought, <i>Good. Witches. Maybe this will really sell</i>.
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
Mehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09112613661290336699noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8266646095852048525.post-59573104632215269492013-04-13T20:33:00.000-07:002013-04-25T20:07:42.753-07:00Difficult to Categorize | 4 | Is it Old-Fangled?If this were a choice among on-line catalogue tags—Fiction: Old-Fangled—I’d surely choose it.
<br />
<br />
I was formed in a “less open” time when LGBT people sought arousal in reading because words were what was there—and that not consistently. Indeed, good arousing books with gayness or lesbianism or gender dysphoria (I enjoyed them all) were rare. I pored over Mary Renault and James Kirkwood’s books along with Lisa Alther’s Kinflicks--and of course I loved Rubyfruit Jungle which I remember approaching the cash register to buy at Paperback Booksmith in the Hanover Mall, c. 1975.
<br />
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjxEz7_1o9-Cm-fuxwStJPzRlC8lUPOANytEHmZQCB5DNJ6Etb_gwfc9GAwI70f3vFa_cH3pujQq8fyHccMQ_0nZ_y5gYfS0ugfVu4JMhq9fb3vuyUkhRSaaxC9SjltCfXHJmdq691b_zk/s1600/mall.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="259" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjxEz7_1o9-Cm-fuxwStJPzRlC8lUPOANytEHmZQCB5DNJ6Etb_gwfc9GAwI70f3vFa_cH3pujQq8fyHccMQ_0nZ_y5gYfS0ugfVu4JMhq9fb3vuyUkhRSaaxC9SjltCfXHJmdq691b_zk/s320/mall.jpg" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">The Mall <em>(close approximation)</em></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
It probably cost $1.25 (if that) and had a nice bright white cover with big mod graphics embossed in metallic berry colors. Pretty quickly my younger sister lifted Rubyfruit Jungle from my bedroom and then passed it around among all her junior high school friends; it came back ragged, brutalized. I always liked the first part of the book better than the mother-daughter chapters in New York; as for Rita Mae Brown (who writes cat mysteries and books about fox-hunting with human and animal characters now--which is fine) I always preferred Six of One.
<br />
<br />
And I always preferred Kinflicks—which I first read when my mother had it out from the library on the strength of its reviews, liking books by women generally. I’m not sure how well she liked Kinflicks, with its women in and out of wheat jeans having sex together. She renewed it at least once that I recall, a sign that she found it tough going; it was a big thick hardback book that sat in a stack on her bedside table, where I found it. Up by their pillows, when my parents weren’t in their bedroom, I sat and read this best-selling, well-reviewed, mainstream novel about a lesbian, basically, cover to cover, back and forth, inside and out, c. 1976-77.<br />
<br />
<br />
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.landmarkweb.com/2011/04/02/hanover-massachusetts/" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" target="_blank"><img border="0" height="213" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgCxgXHlIbYuc2sHk1W2XyJ-VBuZpfdc2FbqjeTzpu3xYetTNGYSR83lyJlvmTt7lZBJUUd47JTw7rBSdB6IuYZyo4j8aVTA3A-JBSDBTkbP_vQ4xorBSMs4HancWUpq2f555R0LMwUw54/s320/Hanover-StAndrews.jpg" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Our old street <em>(photo date unknown)</em></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
I re-read Kinflicks just as closely when I acquired my own paperback copies; I’ve owned at least two. It’s the kind of book to buy at stoop sales and loan out on impulse. Ginny Babcock, the heroine’s name returns to me from years ago. I thought new books would always be this way. It was another time.
Mehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09112613661290336699noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8266646095852048525.post-385157999076618792013-04-11T19:49:00.002-07:002013-05-05T13:31:40.886-07:00Difficult to Categorize | 3 | Is it LGBT?Yes!
<br />
<br />
An uncategorical chorus of up-votes for that one. Both <a href="http://www.famepunk.com/home/middlemarch" target="_blank">Famepunk Part 2: Middlemarch</a> and its precursor <a href="http://www.famepunk.com/home" target="_blank">Part 1: US Open 1987</a> are extremely LGBT. There’s all the many lesbians plus gays throughout, along with definite bisexuals and at least one pivotal character who’s sexually transitioning. Start to finish, I’ve got this category covered.
<br />
<br />
Yet I didn’t publish Part 1 as LGBT (I put it up in the Sports Fiction category) specifically because that book contains no more than a smidgen of one lesbian sex scene not even involving the lead characters and I figured anyone coming for LGBT would want more sex. Because I would. That being, in my mind, the main part of the pact between LGBT author and reader, who through the magic of publishing meet in a space with that sign right on the roof: LGBT. Meaning: Here will be sex of that kind described; lesbian, gay, bisexual and/or transgendered sex acts will be depicted. For me and I suppose for my cohort, whoever we are, having the LGBT option at all makes the ADULT and Erotica tags feel strangely redundant and hair-splitting.
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://www.google.com/search?q=sports+fiction&hl=en&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=iXhnUYzYB_On4AOmx4DQDA&sqi=2&ved=0CAcQ_AUoAQ&biw=1024&bih=648" target="_blank"><img border="0" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhv-Jo-L8cG5L1Q-GLAxnSzBCQurlO_khpFAyjrUza00BxqcQN3jbpsogTh-zH8LuAqA0ldyjZQhkMKbJkn9SkDHWU2UbFfFgIfx1BCXeb_hmqnIYfOJc1Oi0S0laA9xG9WPe5SPcKTvz4/s400/sportsfiction.jpg" width="281" /></a></div>
<br />
Is this generational? As I reflect, now, I recognize that to touch and arouse sexual feelings might appear as a chore and not a duty to the modern-day LGBT writer. Who might just want to write about characters while steering clear of their sex lives; maybe they want to write LGBT action with no sex at all—only, antiquing or something. Solving or committing murders at major antiques shows or racecourses. Teaching at a local community college while also being a shape-shifter. It’s possible. Writers who might have decided that if there were sex scenes they’d call it ADULT and stamp it Erotic but there are not, there aren’t any sex scenes, such writers could be publishing novels at this very moment and tagging them LGBT without a qualm. For all I know, Middlemarch with its shameless excess in the lesbian sex scene department might be greeted like an interloping pervert in the normal, default, ADULT-filtered LGBT catalogue—where the unwary moms of school-aged children go to buy their lesbian books, an old exhibitionist slouched in a playground raincoat.
Mehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09112613661290336699noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8266646095852048525.post-11728819811735850062013-04-07T19:58:00.000-07:002013-04-09T19:59:59.181-07:00Difficult to Categorize | 2 | Is it ADULT?The fact is that <a href="http://www.famepunk.com/home/middlemarch" target="_blank">Famepunk Part 2: Middlemarch</a> concerns the birth and progress of a passionate, comical, highly combustible love affair between two teenage girls who also happen to be competing as champions on the international tennis circuit in 1988--and it contains a great deal of lesbian sexual content. It just does. In the Famepunk series, this is the book about young dumb love, the modern take on Romeo & Juliet & Heathcliff & Cathy; like Twilight. Except—importantly! importantly!—with actual sex scenes and lesbians. Lots of and quite long scenes, too, this book is 800 pages long.
<br />
<br />
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgNOQX-PDeIvhwwTERrfSmK0sx15KqlkUkX25GVvo_nhNJ0ZRCs_lswtPyKiGSprL-GoR8o_1ye9W8xKiJh2hSHdum13Utx-KBr3yp7r5J-aowz_C7UmeT4jprzToA0i9Id-ODxY5OMCYI/s1600/364924_0_eyond-the-valley-of-the-dolls_400.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgNOQX-PDeIvhwwTERrfSmK0sx15KqlkUkX25GVvo_nhNJ0ZRCs_lswtPyKiGSprL-GoR8o_1ye9W8xKiJh2hSHdum13Utx-KBr3yp7r5J-aowz_C7UmeT4jprzToA0i9Id-ODxY5OMCYI/s320/364924_0_eyond-the-valley-of-the-dolls_400.jpg" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><em>RIP Roger Ebert 1942-2013</em></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
I don’t mean to exaggerate. Middlemarch is not a porno. It has erotic moments (many) but it’s not erotic like Judith Krantz’s Scruples, for instance, or The Story of O or Anne Rice’s Beauty novels. All of which, yes, while admiring them I would vote YES to save aside in the adults’ reading room at the public library as in the North American home. But Famepunk? Tons of sex, sure, but all plot-driven, not the plot itself. There are many other things that happen, many other characters. Ronald Reagan appears in a phone call, for goodness sake—there’s a potluck buffet in a Panhandle church basement. You ask me, is Famepunk Part 2: Middlemarch for adults? I answer: Certainly—all adults! All adult readers are welcome.
<br />
<br />
But is it ADULT?
<br />
<br />
I spend some days slightly flummoxed by this question. I’ve returned to Smashwords and as directed in the FAQ, I’ve clicked the homepage adult content filter ON to OFF. I see what they’re getting at right away when “Criss Cross Romance Short Story” gets replaced by “Fuck the Foreplay” at the top of the Gay & Lesbian Most Downloaded list; there are many additional lesbian ADULT titles to browse. I've now read two, <a href="https://www.smashwords.com/profile/view/hildredbillings" target="_blank">one set in Japan </a> and the other written by <a href="https://www.smashwords.com/profile/view/geonn" target="_blank">an extremely prolific young man from Oklahoma</a> (male authors have always written a lot of the lesbian fiction that sees the light of day).
<br />
<br />
Clicking the ADULT box while publishing a book in the Lesbian Erotica category, as the hard-working author of Daisuki did, I can understand—if I believed Middlemarch belonged there, I'd do it, too. But what the hell motivation lies behind clicking the ADULT box for a book with hardly any sex? I’m mystified—although I assume there’s some concerted effort going into the pursuit of horny reader dollars, the ADULT tag here advertising the presence of sex to an audience that favors, for whatever reason, softcore material. Finally it hits me. This is the ADULT from the cable TV warning: The following program contains adult subject matter. Viewer discretion is advised. This is that category, out in the world now, inside writers’ heads, as a question: Would that warning be required up-front if their novel were a TV movie?
<br />
<br />
First: for Famepunk, yes, naturally. But: I do not accept that category. I think it’s bogus. I decry the strain of self-censorship it fosters, the infiltration of private imagination by market forces that it both invites and represents. I believe all art works, including those created for children, should aspire to excite interest and pleasure among the most sophisticated and discerning "grown-up" adults available. Only books that have no hope of doing so should come with warnings, in my opinion.
Mehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09112613661290336699noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8266646095852048525.post-52634089696210130112013-04-02T18:46:00.002-07:002013-04-07T20:00:38.401-07:00Difficult to Categorize | 1 | Is it YA?I've been polishing these second editions and preparing files for print and re-formatting them for Kindle and formatting them some more for Smashwords through which I'll distribute to iStore and Nook. In the midst of doing this I find I'm still locked into Amazon’s exclusive-to-Kindle program for <a href="http://www.famepunk.com/home/middlemarch" target="_blank">Famepunk Part 2: Middlemarch</a>, dating back to when I'd published it for Kindle on the day before the hurricane, back in October; I really rushed out that first edition in case something happened. As usual not reading the fine print but especially not with a hurricane coming I missed the part about automatic renewal—I just went naturally for the 70% royalty and figured I could wait three months before putting it on Smashwords. Three months I do standing on my head, easy. But five months later I've made a lot of changes, I'm happy with the results, and I want to get both these books “out there” so I can move on to the next one. Period. Instead, because I missed the renewal, I’m back in month two again—five months, by the way, with nothing to show, 70% of nothing, zero. Annoyed with myself and none too pleased with Amazon or its customer base, I've unchecked the proper on-screen box and will be free at the end of April to complete its publication process when I post Famepunk Part 2: Middlemarch on Smashwords. Where, I've noticed, I'll have to check a different box to say whether it contains content unsuitable to be seen by readers under 18 years of age, or not.
<br />
<br />
What strikes me first about that is 18 being a high cutoff. As a young lesbian, say even at 14 or 15 I'd have seized on and embraced a book like this with all my attention, I’d have read it straight through on a school night, seriously. Granted I was intellectually precocious but lesbians are often intellectually precocious, this is not a necessary sign of lesbianism but it's an indicator. I think it might have done me some good, too, to read this book at that age. By 18, I'd already slept with the wrong woman—and I was <i>not</i> precocious sexually. Kids these days, not uncommonly, I've heard things, today’s 17 year-olds would be the equivalent to what childless divorcees represented experientially in my own youth.
<br />
<br />
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjxkW1L_6aot70JA9KWAnIPtfs_ggnarhA5JeFRXDSobDc_wTj-64XUtbHMQPDCl423kEk2yYbBUD_WqwMECvGQedXK-iywGBTsL_rOyOzQZJP28aSrEi41vyK2Rmve6dY_hC9wwpMDvrw/s1600/bieliebers.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="251" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjxkW1L_6aot70JA9KWAnIPtfs_ggnarhA5JeFRXDSobDc_wTj-64XUtbHMQPDCl423kEk2yYbBUD_WqwMECvGQedXK-iywGBTsL_rOyOzQZJP28aSrEi41vyK2Rmve6dY_hC9wwpMDvrw/s400/bieliebers.jpg" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><em>Bieliebers: They just love that lesbian boy.</em></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
So, no. Even though the book is one big vast and tumbling cornucopia of lesbian erotic thoughts and deeds including public sex, rough sex, and masturbation, I wouldn't call it unsuitable for readers between 13 and 17 years of age. It’s a book about teens and that’s the kind of sex teens have—in real life. They know this. So is Famepunk Part 2: Middlemarch written for teens? No. Is it YA? Of course not. It isn't. Should teens read it? I say yes, if only because it will take them all a great many hours they would otherwise spend texting each other about blow jobs and cyber-bullying schemes, if media is to be believed. (It isn’t.)
Mehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09112613661290336699noreply@blogger.com0